Legal Opinion
People v. Murray
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1971No. Crim. 19864PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALLPORT, J.
By information defendant was charged with a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11501 (selling heroin). His motion under Penal Code section 995 was granted and the case dismissed. The People appeal from the order setting aside the information. The appeal lies. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1).)
At the preliminary hearing Francisco Garcia, a police officer of the City of Los Angeles, testified that on the day in question he was assigned to the administrative narcotic division buy team. A person named Julio, previously unknown to Garcia, was assigned to work with him.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Perry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JourdainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. DickinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973