Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 2003No. 88,881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

Wayne A. Graham was found guilty by a magistrate judge of driving under the influence of alcohol. Graham appealed his conviction to the district court, then filed motions in limine, a motion to suppress, and a motion for a Frye hearing concerning the admissibility of the blood alcohol test evidence. Rawlins County District Court Judge Glenn D. Schiffner ruled that the enzyme analysis testing procedure used by the State did not meet the requirements of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), and that the blood test results were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Kuhn v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. WardenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. State v. WolfeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. State v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Heindlmeyer v. Ottawa County Concealed Weapons Licensing BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In re the Care & Treatment of GirardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API