Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Deitschel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1930No. 25,861PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMabtin, J.

The appellant brought this action to recover a balance of $628.77 alleged to be due on a building contract, for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, and for attorneys’ fees in the sum of $125.00. The appellee filed an answer in general denial and also paragraphs of answer and cross-complaint asking damages because of alleged defective, improper and inferior material and workmanship used and performed in the construction of the house. The appellant, by reply, set up that there had been an agreement between the parties as to the amount due and- a partial payment made, leaving the balance due in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. KilbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Epp v. HintonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Sain v. BogleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Lowry v. Le ClereSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Evors v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Burkhart v. BurkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Templeton v. Sam Klain & Son, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Fox v. GalvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Dragoo v. DragooIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Thomas v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API