Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1894No. 17,295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowabD, J.

The appellee was found guilty of uttering a forged and counterfeit promissory note, with intent to cheat and defraud, as charged in" the following count of indictment, to wit:

"And the grand jury, as aforesaid, for a second count, on their oaths, further charge and present that one *44Philip T. Williams, late of said county, on the — day of January, 1892, at said county and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully, falsely, fraudulently, and knowingly, utter, publish and pass to one JohnG. Price, the agent of Bertha Delorme, and thereby to said Bertha Delorme, as true and genuine, a certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trout v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McGinnis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State v. AtkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Bader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ware v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Gottlieb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  5. United States v. FulkersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API