State v. Waterbury
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court.— Hon. J. H. Preston, Judge. Ti-ie defendant was convicted' of having knowingly utteTed a forged check, and appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Ladd, J.—
The accused was charged in the indictment with knowingly uttering a check of $10.80, purporting to have been signed by C. L. Besler, with indorsements thereon — “ F. Miller ” and “ Jos. Campaigne.” It appeared from the evidence that some one purchased a dozen bananas of a person bearing the name last mentioned, and delivered this check in payment, receiving the difference in money, and that thereafter the name of Campaigne was indorsed thereon in presenting it to the bank for payment. Does the fact that the name was not on the check when uttered, as alleged, constitute a fatal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Inman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- State v. YergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- State v. HaffaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- United States v. PaulingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- State v. RobySupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- State v. WheelockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.