State v. Kendrick
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LeGRAND, Justice.
This appeal raises three issues upon which defendant relies for reversal. They are:(1) Failure of the State to prove commission of the crime in the specific manner alleged in the indictment;(2) Error in admitting certain evidence obtained from defendant in violation of his constitutional right against self-incrimination under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974; and(3) Error in failing to declare a mistrial because a State witness referred to defendant’s “past record.”
I. A grand jury indictment accused defendant of “forgery as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. DrososSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. O'KELLYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Hamburg v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.