Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-1989PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

Defendant, Marlys Brooks, prepared a backdated check on her employer’s account in an amount not authorized by her employer. She did so in an effort to conceal an earlier theft of funds. Brooks subsequently pleaded guilty to one count of forgery in violation of Iowa Code section 715A.2(l)(b) (1993). She now claims her trial counsel was ineffective in allowing her to plead guilty because there was no factual basis for the forgery charge. Brooks asserts she could not be found guilty of forgery based on making “a writing so that it purports to be the act of another who did not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. State v. HackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. StrawSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State of Iowa v. Craig Anthony FinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State v. SchminkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. State v. BearseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API