Legal Opinion

Ericsson v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 2012No. C096522CV; A145698PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioners appeal a judgment affirming an order of the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD or department) that denied relief to petitioners under section 6 of Measure 49 (2007).1 Petitioners obtained land use regulation waivers from DLCD under Measure 37 (2004) in order to facilitate residential development of two adjacent lots in rural Washington County.2 Measure 49 repealed Measure 37 waiver remedies, replacing them with various processes to obtain state approvals for “home sites” on the affected properties. DLCD denied petitioners’ application for homesite approvals for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bertsch v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Hardy v. State Land BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Papworth v. Oregon Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. McCollum v. State ex rel. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. ActkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API