Legal Opinion
Flournoy v. Wiener
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 28, 1944No. 252PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
This case comes here on appeal under § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a), from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, appellant assigning as error that that court had held invalid, as in violation of the Fifth Amendment, § 402 (b) (2) of the Revenue Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 942. On considering the jurisdictional statement filed by appellant pursuant to Rule 12 of the Rules of this Court, we postponed decision of the jurisdictional questions to the argument on the merits.
Section 237 (a) of the Judicial Code authorizes an appeal to this Court from a judgment of the highest…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Donald J. Willy, and George A. Young v. The Coastal Corp., Coastal States Management Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.