Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Pollard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1922No. 7 Div. 300PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit, in counts for trespass and trover, resulted in judgment for defendant.

The general affirmative charge in writing was given at defendant’s request. As to when affirmative instruction with hypothesis may be given has been frequently discussed by this court. It is only where there is no evidence tending to establish plaintiff’s case as made under the counts of complaint in question that the court may direct a verdict for defendant as to such count. McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 South. 135.

Appellant’s counsel, stating his insistence, says:

“That Pridgen’s holding after appellant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Davis & Son v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Alston v. AlstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Ryan v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Americar, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Cox v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Land v. NiehausSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Treadwell Ford, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Birmingham Loan Co. v. KlinnerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API