Legal Opinion
State v. Castillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1990No. 11074, 11119PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his convictions for trafficking cocaine and conspiracy to traffic cocaine. He raises three issues on appeal: (1) whether he made a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel; (2) whether he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney had a conflict of interest: and (3) whether there was sufficient evidence to support his convictions. Other issues listed in the docketing statement but not briefed are abandoned. State v. Fish, 102 N.M. 775, 701 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.1985). We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On the morning of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Ronald Maynard v. Larry MeachumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Thomas McKee v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. PlouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. VincentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. PinoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.