Legal Opinion

State v. Pino

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1996No. 16649, 16958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

1. These cases raise the question of whether a conviction from a prior criminal proceeding, where an indigent defendant’s waiver of counsel lacked the countersignature of a district public defender, is valid to enhance a later conviction. This is an issue of first impression, and we consolidate the cases. We hold that such a waiver is valid.

2. Defendant Pino was indicted by a grand jury for one count of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI). The State notified Defendant that it would seek enhancement of the DWI to a fourth degree felony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Quintana v. SchnedarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. NashNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. ThorntonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API