State v. Pino
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
1. These cases raise the question of whether a conviction from a prior criminal proceeding, where an indigent defendant’s waiver of counsel lacked the countersignature of a district public defender, is valid to enhance a later conviction. This is an issue of first impression, and we consolidate the cases. We hold that such a waiver is valid.
2. Defendant Pino was indicted by a grand jury for one count of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI). The State notified Defendant that it would seek enhancement of the DWI to a fourth degree felony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Quintana v. SchnedarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DalrympleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. NashNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ThorntonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.