Legal Opinion

Sanfilippo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2420PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONOFRIO, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order in the trial court which reduced the amount of a jury verdict rendered in favor of the appellants. The trial judge found as a matter of law that charges for certain physical therapy treatments rendered to the two appellants by unlicensed assistants of a naturopathic doctor, Victor J. Haag, were not reasonable medical expenses as required by the insurance policy issued to appellants by the appellee insurance company. The trial judge found that these charges were not recoverable as medical expenses under the insurance policy and not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magit v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Newhouse v. Board of Osteopathic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. State v. PaulNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb Ex Rel. Webb v. Clark County SchoolNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API