State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVERMORE, Judge.
Osteopaths and chiropractors are permitted to engage in physical therapy as part of their practice. We are asked to decide in this ease whether their assistants may be permitted to administer such therapy. The rules of defendants, the A-izona Board of Chiropractic Examiners and the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners, permit this activity. Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company brought this declaratory judgment action seeking to hold the rules invalid as beyond the authority of the boards to adopt. It appeals from an adverse summary judgment. We…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Promulgation of Njac 13: 35-6.14New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Sanfilippo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
3Cited by1 opinion
- Webb Ex Rel. Webb v. Clark County SchoolNevada Supreme Court · 2009