Legal Opinion
Amy & Vicky v. United States District Court for the Western District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2012No. 12-73414PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771, the Crime Victims Rights Act (“CVRA”). 1
This matter has previously been on appeal, see United States v. Kennedy, 643 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir.2011) (“Kennedy ”), and a three-judge panel of this court affirmed defendant’s conviction and sentence but vacated the prior restitution order entered by the district court. In so doing, the panel applied United States v. Laney, 189 F.3d 954, 965 (9th Cir.1999) (holding that 18 U.S.C. § 2259 “incorporates a requirement of proximate causation” based in part on the “proximate…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Paul Frederick LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- W. Patrick Kenna v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Roberto Ortega-Mendez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Vicky v. U.S. Dist. Court for the W. Dist. of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014