Sheriff, Clark County v. Hanks
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, C. J.:
This appeal challenges a district court order entered upon respondent Clinton Hanks’ petition for habeas corpus, dismissing a charge of “capital murder” allegedly perpetrated by “executing a contract to kill.”
Nevada’s “capital murder” statute, which our 1973 Legislature enacted in attempted response to Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), undertakes to make the death penalty mandatory for five kinds of murder, including “executing a contract to kill.” After so declaring, NRS 200.030(1) (c) further recites that “contract to kill” means “an agreement,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herrick v. HerrickNevada Supreme Court · 1933
- Ex parte DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Sardis v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Gaston v. DrakeNevada Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Anderson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Sessions v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Sheriff v. EncoeNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Knight v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Carter v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.