Legal Opinion

Knight v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2000No. 31810PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

FACTS

The facts underlying the instant prosecution are unusual. Prior to the charged incident, appellant Samuel Knight had confronted Matthew Minton, a resident of an apartment in Las Vegas, on at least two prior occasions. Appellant complained to Minton that someone in the apartment had taken his car.

On August 22, 1997, at approximately 8:30 a.m., appellant knocked on the door of the apartment where Minton was staying. Jenise Landolfa, another resident of the apartment, went to the door. Landolfa saw appellant through the peephole and told him that if he did not leave, she would call…

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allred v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rosas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Haney v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sampson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bridges v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API