Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beier, J.:
This case comes to us on two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit:
1. Independent of the Kansas alternative remedies doctrine, does Kansas law — including but not limited to Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 266 Kan. 198, 967 P.2d 295 (1998); Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893, 752 P.2d 685 (1988); Riddle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 27 Kan. App. 2d 79, 998 P.2d 114 (2000); and Murphy v. City of Topeka, 6 Kan. App. 2d 488, 630 P.2d 186 (1981)—recognize an action in tort based on an employer’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Lewis v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Pfeifer v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.