Legal Opinion

Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 19, 2004No. 90,730PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

This case comes to us on two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit:

1. Independent of the Kansas alternative remedies doctrine, does Kansas law — including but not limited to Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 266 Kan. 198, 967 P.2d 295 (1998); Palmer v. Brown, 242 Kan. 893, 752 P.2d 685 (1988); Riddle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 27 Kan. App. 2d 79, 998 P.2d 114 (2000); and Murphy v. City of Topeka, 6 Kan. App. 2d 488, 630 P.2d 186 (1981)—recognize an action in tort based on an employer’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Husky Hogs, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Lewis v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Hysten v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Pfeifer v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API