Legal Opinion
Pattock v. St. Cloud Public Service Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 28, 1922No. 22,701PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Action to recover for the wrongful death of Anthony Pattock, for the benefit of his heirs, caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant company, which is engaged in generating and distributing electricity to consumers. There was a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $7,500. From an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial, defendant appeals.
No exception was taken to the portion of the charge covered by appellant’s fourth assignment of error, nor was it assigned as error in the motion for a new trial. We discover no reversible error in the charge covered by other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Hoppe v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Tozer v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Rothenberger v. Powers Fuel, Feed, Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Neumann v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy EyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.