Legal Opinion
Neumann v. Interstate Power Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 20, 1929No. 27,410PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendants appeal from the order denying their motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial. The action is to recover for the death of O. H. Nelson, plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act and negligence of defendants.
The short facts concerning Nelson’s death are these: He and Dr. Moulton were tenants of a duplex situated on lot 4 in block 1 of Litcher’s Addition to the village of Lewiston this state. There are no sewers in the village, but buildings with modern conveniences have cesspools. In 1926 a cesspool for this duplex caved in and,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Braun v. . Buffalo General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Card v. Wenatchee Valley Gas & Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Hoppe v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trimyer v. Norfolk Tallow Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. WaltersMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Green River Rural Electric Co-Op. Corp. v. BlandfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Arnold v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Greenwald v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.