State v. Rosario
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized during the search of his house, in denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him, in admitting certain evidence over his objections, and in refusing to instruct the jury on the defense of entrapment.
The State’s evidence tended to show the following: On 13 January 1987, Eduardo Stewart discussed obtaining a kilogram of cocaine with defendant, Antonio Suarez, and Guillermo Gomez. The discussion took place in defendant’s house in Fayetteville. On 18 January 1987, Stewart flew…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. RookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ShelmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.