Legal Opinion

Holbeck v. Hull

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1959No. 7761PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, Judge

This is an action to determine adverse claims to 120 acres of real property located in McKenzie County. The plaintiff claimed an interest in the land described in the complaint under an oil and gas lease. The several defendants, by answer and counterclaim, asserted interests in said land adverse to the plaintiff and adverse to each other. Trial of the case resulted in a judgment decreeing that the plaintiff was the owner of a valid oil and gas lease of the entire mineral interest underlying such property. Defendants have appealed from the judgment and have demanded a trial anew in this court.

P…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buman v. SturnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Ulrich v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pederson v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Bloomdale v. Sargent CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Schule v. ReuleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McKenzie CountyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1960
  2. David Rolfsrud v. Continental Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
  3. Holbeck v. HullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API