Legal Opinion
People v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1969No. Crim. 16586PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, J.
Defendant, Arthur Wright, was charged by information with possession of marijuana for sale in violation of section 11531 of the Health and Safety Code. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the information pursuant to Penal Code section 995 was granted. This appeal is by the People in accordance with Penal Code section 1238, subdivision 1.
Statement of Facts
Because of the limited issue which is before this court, only such facts as are necessary to a determination thereof will be set forth in this opinion.
Charles Ham was hired by the Pasadena Police Department to work as an undercover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Marshall M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. GilmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Sykes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. SobiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. SahagunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Penney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.