Legal Opinion

Galaxy Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Idaho Transportation Department

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1985No. 15421, 15423 and 15424PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellants appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Idaho Transportation Department. The district court, in granting summary judgment, ruled that contracts executed between the advertising companies and the Idaho Department of Transportation bound all parties and prevented the advertising companies from recovering for certain highway signs removed pursuant to federal and state highway beautification acts. We affirm.

This controversy arose following the enactment of the Federal Highway Beautification Act in 1965. The federal act required that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Theriault v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Smith v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Suchan v. SuchanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lindberg v. RosethIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Clement v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Clements Farms, Inc. v. Ben Fish & SonIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API