Legal Opinion
Interchange State Bank v. Riegel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
190 N.J. Super. 139 (1983)
462 A.2d 198
INTERCHANGE STATE BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOHN R. RIEGEL, DEFENDANT, AND ELAINE RIEGEL CHAIPIS, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 7, 1983.
Decided June 28, 1983.
Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW[1] and BRODY.
Lloyd M. Cohen argued the cause for appellant (Cohen & Cohen attorneys; Lloyd M. Cohen on the brief).
Jonathan N. Harris argued the cause for respondent (Andora, Palmisano, De Cotiis & Harris attorneys; Jonathan N. Harris, on the brief; John P. Palmisano, of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- King v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Dvorken v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Sisco v. New Jersey Bank, NANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Dvorken v. BARRETTS.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Freda v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- In Re BeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Mueller v. Youmans (In Re Youmans)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Vander Weert v. Vander WeertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.