Legal Opinion

Dvorken v. BARRETTS.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 2, 1968PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan of the Appellate Division. 100 N. J. Super. 306.

For affirmance —• Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Sohettino and HaneMAK - 7.

For reversal — Hone.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dvorken v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Freda v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Morsemere Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. NicolaouNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  4. Sisco v. New Jersey Bank, NANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Interchange State Bank v. RiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API