Legal Opinion
Vander Weert v. Vander Weert
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 25, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.
Appellant Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, Esqs. (Cohn Lifland), a New Jersey law firm, appeals from the denial of its post-judgment motion to intervene in this divorce case. We reverse the order denying the motion, and since the merits of appellant’s legal position and claim for relief have been fidly argued, we have opted to decide the question raised. We now dismiss appellant’s application for relief as without merit.
The issue before us is the extent of the interest in the marital residence obtained by an attorney for one of the parties who, during the pendency of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- King v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Freda v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Sisco v. New Jersey Bank, NANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Portner v. PortnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- N.T.B. v. D.D.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Paul Ruitenberg, III v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Lawrence v. Lawrence (In Re Lawrence)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Sikirica v. Harber (In re Harber)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Barsotti v. MercedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.