Legal Opinion
Canady v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 29, 1995No. JFM-95-783PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Robert L. Canady sues the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit. Authority (WMATA), Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO, Local 689 (Local 689), and the Transit Employees Health and Welfare Plan (the Plan) to recover life insurance benefits. The case arises from the denial of plaintiffs claim for $20,000 of life insurance benefits after the death of his wife. Defendants maintain that plaintiffs wife failed to make the contributions required to maintain benefits and had notice that her benefits therefore had been suspended. The parties have filed cross-motions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re MuellerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Onuigbo v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)District Court, D. Maryland · 2022