Legal Opinion
Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2003-1768PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff Ramesh Sharma filed this action asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and “tortious interferences with trust relationship.” He also pleads violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). He alleges that defendants acted unlawfully and in concert to decrease the amount of his monthly retirement pension benefit. Before the Court is defendants’…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sharma v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Benton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022