Public Utilities Commission v. Natatorium Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Dissent
DUNN, J.,
Dissenting. — On October 28, 1920, the Public Utilities Commission of the state of Idaho, hereafter re*321ferred to as the commission, issued an order requiring appellant to show cause why it should not be stopped from increasing its rates for the users of hot water. The case brought by Mrs. Cruza Arostegui and Juan Yribar, complainants, against the Natatorium Company was consolidated with the order ta show cause and the city of Boise, Edward Stein and Jessie S. Hurtt as users of hot water intervened. On November 15, 1920, appellant, appearing specially, moved to dismiss the proceedings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Pocantico Water Works Co. v. BirdNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.