Legal Opinion

Jones v. Berryhill

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided August 2, 2019No. 2:18-cv-00080PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a Social Security appeal. In response to the recommended denial of his Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiff has filed Objections (Doc. No. 23) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. No. 16). Spanning 34-pages, those objections could just as well have served as Plaintiff's opening brief, notwithstanding Rule 72(b)'s requirement, that "a party ... file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1) (emphasis…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. (SS) Buethe v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (SS) Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (SS) Thompson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (SS) Thompson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Anita J. Burton v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API