Legal Opinion
Hudson-Kane v. Berryhill
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 28, 2017No. 3:13-0026PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARBARA D. HOLMES, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs claim for a period of disability, Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”), and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”), as provided under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). The case is currently pending on Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record (Docket Entry No. 12), to which Defendant has responded…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aloyo v. KijakaziDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Barber v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Clanton v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Collier v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Cooper v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner ofDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.