In Re Disbarment of Archie L. Gennow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This proceeding for the discipline of a member of our bar is before us on original and supplemental complaints of misconduct, after hearing before the Honorable D. H. Fullerton, judge of the fifteenth judicial district, as referee. We decide the matter on his findings, there being no settled case such as is provided for by Rule XXIY.
After hearing the evidence pro and con under .the original complaint, the referee, in elaboration of his findings, frankly expressed his opinion that the misconduct disclosed did not justify disbarment. But, after hearing the evidence supporting the second…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Disbarment of Robert J. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- In re StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Matter of Discipline of BrasethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.