Armitage v. Bar Rules Committee
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Grieein Smith, Chief Justice.
We are asked to reverse the trial court’s judgment that appellant — sometimes referred to as the respondent — should be permanently disbarred because of unprofessional conduct extending over a protracted period. Rules for the procedure were adopted April 24, 1939, under authority of Amendment No. 28 to the Constitution.
The motion for a new trial lists twenty-eight matters it is contended were erroneously disposed of by the trial judge.
The respondent’s motion to make the complaint more definite and certain was granted, but a defense demurrer was overruled. Other-…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Armitage v. Morris, AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Weems v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Davis v. MerrittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Myers v. MuussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- People v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.