Legal Opinion

Graham v. Mixon

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1917No. Sac. No. 2460PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff, who resides in Sacramento County, brought an action for libel against defendants, who live in Yolo County and there publish “The Mail of Woodland.” This newspaper, in which, according to the complaint, the alleged libel was published, is circulated and read in Sacramento County, according to the averments of said complaint.

Defendants moved for a change of the place of trial to the county of their residence, which, they say, is the only proper place of trial. If this contention be correct, they were entitled to the order which they sought. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 397.) The motion was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gridley v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Older v. Superior Court of the State in and for KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Rains v. Diamond Match Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Dobbs v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Mason v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API