Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Faulkner

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 15, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

We have a motion for an appeal from a judgment for $200 in an action by the ap-pellee, Mrs. J. F. Faulkner, to recover the value of a mule killed by one of the appellant’s trains. The case was submitted to the court upon the mere stipulation that the mule, of the value of $200, had strayed from the plaintiff’s premises about a mile from the place on the track where it was struck and killed. The judgment is based on the fact that the defendant had not offered evidence to rebut the presumption of negligence created by that part of § 277.330, Kentucky Revised Statutes,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Markendorf v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  5. Priest v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Gamble Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Berens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Chicago and North Western Railway Co. v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Linenbrink v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API