Legal Opinion

Chicago and North Western Railway Co. v. Bishop

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1964No. 3211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

The railroad company appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for loss of a Shetland pony killed on the railroad company’s right of way by one of the company’s trains. By admitting the pony came upon the right of way through a hole in its right of way fence, appellant apparently concedes that its fencing was not kept in proper repair. Sections 37-209 and 37-210, W.S.1957, which were first enacted by Ch. 84, S.L. of Wyoming, 1907, and ever since have remained unchanged, are as follows :

Section 37-209:

“All railway corporations, owning or operating a line of railway within the state,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. IveySupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Hines v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Berens v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Department Of Public Service RegulationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Roitz v. KidmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Department of Public Service RegulationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Holmes Herefords, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1990
  5. Burchette v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API