Legal Opinion

Loumar, Inc. v. Charles Smith and Michael J. Smith, Individually and D/B/A S & S Supply

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 22, 1983No. 82-1303PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

In the time that has been spent by the lawyers for a Texas corporation in efforts to assert in a Texas federal court the corporation’s diversity-based claims against Maryland residents, the case could doubtless have been brought to a conclusion. The parties having in the course of two lawsuits gained nothing but experience, we affirm dismissal of this action for want of jurisdiction.

The jurisdictional facts are quickly stated. Loumar, Inc. is a Texas corporation engaged in the sale of aircraft parts to federal agencies. To fill a successful bid with the Coast…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Siskind v. Villa Foundation for Education, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Zarnow v. CITY OF WICHITA FALLS, TEX.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API