Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2004No. 03-20202PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Procter & Gamble Company and the Procter & Gamble Distributing Company (jointly referred to in the singular as “P&G”) appeal a summary judgment in favor of defendant Amway Corporation, alleging that the district court gave improper res judicata effect to a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Concluding that the Utah court’s judgment is entitled to res judicata effect, we affirm.

I

The dispute between Procter & Gamble and Amway has been before this court on two prior occasions. See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., 242 F.3d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Jones v. Sheehan, Young & Culp, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Torres-AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Turner v. PleasantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. James v. Texas Collin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States Ex Rel. Steury v. Cardinal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. William Windham v. Harris County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API