Legal Opinion
Hammerstein v. Parsons
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from, the Si. Louis City Circioit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
The plaintiff is the executor of Gustav Hammerstein, deceased, and as such he instituted this action at law, to recover of the defendants, as members of the Odd Fellows Mutual Aid Association of Missouri, the sum of one thousand dollars. The Odd Fellows Mutual Aid Association is an unincorporated society, and its object and purposes are fully stated in the case of Emma Hammerstein et al. v. Timothy T. Parsons et al., 29 Mo. App. 509. The opinion in the case referred to also contains a statement of all by-laws, rules and regulations adopted by the society for its government; .therefore, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coleman v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Lyman v. BonneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- White v. Bellefontaine Lodge, Independent Order of Odd FellowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Lachman v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Hammerstein v. ParsonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greer, Mills & Co. v. StollerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1896
- State Ex Rel. Great American Home Savings Institution v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Colley v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- O'Neal v. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Williamson v. Warfield, Pratt, Howell Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.