Legal Opinion
Foster v. JLG INDUSTRIES
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 2005No. CIV. 1:CV032088PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (Doc. 47.) The parties have briefed the issues, and the matter is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant Defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part. Also pending before the court is Plaintiffs motion to disqualify defense counsel. (Doc. 37.) The court will deny Plaintiffs motion.
I. Background
A. Procedural History
The relevant procedural history follows. Plaintiff filed his original complaint -pro se on November 30, 2003 against his former employer, JLG Industries (“JLG”).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Evans v. Chichester School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Foster v. JLG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Schlumberger Technology Corporation, as assignee of Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. First Mercury Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025