Legal Opinion

People v. Lipschitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for certificate of reasonable doubt.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

The chief point urged on this application is that section 1459 of the Consolidation Act, under which appellant was *634convicted, is null and void and unenforcible for the reasons: (a) That it does not define or describe the acts or conduct which it undertakes to prohibit, and (b) that it fixes no standard of guilt, but leaves such standard to the varying views of the different magistrates who may be called upon to enforce it. Appellant’s counsel in his brief “ to sustain this claim ” refers to People ex rel. Potter v. Managers Wayside Home, 119 Misc. Rep. 428, an opinion by Mr. Justice Benedict,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. People Ex Rel. Burke v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Steinert v. SobeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. People v. ParkerNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1955
  3. People v. YerganNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1937
  4. People v. WeckerNew York Court of Special Session · 1930
  5. People v. PickettNew York Court of Special Session · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API