Legal Opinion

People v. Pickett

New York Court of Special Session

Decided December 11, 1959Published

1DissentAcquavella, J.

The disputed facts are as substantially stated in the majority opinion. The police officer also testified that defendant was stretched out the full length of his body, and occupied about 5 seats. The determination of the trial court was not contrary to the evidence, nor was it against the weight of the evidence.

To constitute disorderly conduct there need be no actual breach of the peace, nor need there be proof of an intent on the part of the defendant to cause a breach of peace. A conviction under section 722 of the Penal Law is justified if the prohibited acts are committed either with an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. People v. LyttonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. York Mortgage Corp. v. Clotar Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API