Legal Opinion

Bates v. Scheik

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Iron Circuit Court. — Hon. J. F. Green, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

On the trial of this case the following facts were conceded: That, on the second day of August, 1887, the defendants, John Schéik and Leopold Schmalz and Gottleib Eyermann, Sr., now deceased, were engaged in the mercantile and commission business in the town of Piedmont, under the firm-name of John Scheik & Co.; that Schmaiz and Eyermann lived in the city of St. Louis, and that Scheik, who lived in Piedmont, had the active management of the business; that by the articles of agreement the copartnership, unless sooner dissolved by consent or by operation of law, would expire by limitation on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ranney v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Adler v. LangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Love v. Central Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Hahs v. Cape Girardeau & Chester RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Stevens v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API