Ranney v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Missouri
Jiprpeal from, Second District Court. ' cited 19 Mo. 642 ; 20 Mo. 276; 21 Mo. 437, 443; 31 Mo. 502, 532; 24 Mo. 524; 33 Mo. 577 ; 37 Mo. 338 ; 33 Mo. 405 ; 30 Mo. 620 ; 8 Mo. 234, 656; 14 Mo. 367; 26 Mo. 122; 25 Mo. 415; 9 Mo. 351; 18 Mo. 103, 106; 31 Mo. 257 ; Collins v. Hough, 26 Mo. 152 ; 30 Mo. 357 ; Berghoff v. Heckwolf, 26 Mo. 514.
1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge
This is a replevin suit. Under an order of the court the property in dispute, or a portion of it, was taken from the defendants and delivered over to the plaintiff. In the progress of the case a demurrer to the petition ivas sustained. Leave to file an amended petition was thereupon granted, but no further petition was ever filed, and the plaintiff subsequently moved the court to dismiss the suit. This, however, in that stage of the proceedings, was not allowable. (Berghoff v. Heckwolf, 26 Mo. 511.) The court, therefore, without, so far as appears, taking any action upon the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berghoff v. HeckwolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Dozier v. JermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
- Finney v. State ex rel. EstissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kreibohm v. YanceySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- White v. McFarlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Southwestern Surety Insurance v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Harding v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- State ex rel. Hunter v. MaulsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.