Legal Opinion
State v. Daugaard
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 23, 1994No. 14859PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the improper admission by the trial court of testimony detailing the defendant’s invocation of various constitutional rights was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant, William Daugaard, was convicted1 after a jury trial of one count of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (l).2 He appealed from the judgment of conviction to the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment. State v. Daugaard, 32 Conn. App. 483, 630 A.2d 96 (1993). We granted the defendant’s petition for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. LuurtsemaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.