Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe John Kafka III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2000No. 99-30305PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:

Joe John Kafka appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm while under a domestic violence restraining order in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8). On appeal, Kafka contends that section 922(g)(8) violates due process because it does not require notice to be given to persons subject to state domestic violence restraining orders that they are prohibited from possessing firearms under federal law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Factual Background

In 1998, Kafka’s ex-wife petitioned for a domestic violence restraining order against Kafka…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Charles JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Harvey Lloyd NapierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Bobby Der Enslin, AKA Bobby De Enslin, Bobby Enslin DCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Varnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API