Legal Opinion

Vance v. Connell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1974No. 11523PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

This appeal places in issue the propriety of the granting of respondent’s cause of action by summary judgment for the respondent pursuant to I.R.C.P. 56. For the reasons stated in this opinion, that order is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court for trial on the merits.

William and Donna Connell, the appellants, entered into a written agreement of lease and option to purchase dated April 19, 1970, with Oather C. Vance, R. D. Willis, and Joseph N. Fenn, d/b/a the Western Land & Cattle Co., hereinafter called respondent. The agreement read as follows:

“AGREEME…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  5. City of Weippe v. YarnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Magic Valley Radiology Associates v. Professional Business Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Boise Tower Associates, LLC v. HoglandIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lewis v. FletcherIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. V-1 Oil Company v. LacyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gugino v. Rowley (In re Floyd)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API