Legal Opinion
H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonald
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 13, 1932No. 431PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This suit is for infringement of patent No. 1,570,776, issued January 26,1926. Prior to this suit, the patent was assigned to appellant. It is for a finger ring having a stone and emblem above the stone. It has had a very marked commercial success; its sale being principally to school and college students.
Theretofore drilled stone rings were made, consisting of a piece of gold, which was bent around to the shape of the finger ring, having a flat or base portion. To this base, in the drilled stone ring, a hollow frame or bezel was soldered; the upper portion of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
- H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Peters Patent Corp. v. Bates & Klinke, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933