Legal Opinion

H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonald

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 17, 1934No. 422PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

This suit is for infringement of United States patent No. 1,570,776. We heretofore held the patent valid and infringed by the defendants [H. W. Peters Co., Inc. v. MacDonald, L. G. Balfour Co., Intervener (C. C. A.) 59 F.(2d) 974] in an opinion by Judge Mantón, and a decree was entered on our mandate for an injunction and the usual reference as to damages and profits.

The invention relates to finger rings and more particularly to means whereby an onyx or other stone can be set without requiring the services of an expert. Under the earlier practice, drilled…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  2. H. W. Peters Co. v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. Plastic Contact Lens CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Bates & Klinke, Inc. v. Peters Patent Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API